www.ExplorOz.com
Your browser does not support the site menu
Click Here
to load alternative navigation.
Latest News
Road Conditions
Updated 2/12/2008
Top End
QLD Coast
Outback NSW
Updated 1/12/2008
WA South Coast
Far North Qld
Outback Qld
Road Conditions
All News...
Site Updates...
Search by Topic
Spare Parts and Tools
4WDriving
Accessories
Accommodation
Activities
Boating
Campers & Trailers
Camping
Caravanning
Communications
Cooking
Driving Skills
Electrics
Fishing
Itineraries & Planning
Membership
Motorhomes
Navigation
Permits
PlotSwap
Recovery Gear
Servicing
Survival
Technical
Things To Do
Topics
Tours
Trek Notes
Trips with Kids
Tyres
Vehicle Choices
Visit Australia
Newsletters
Not Registered
Register Now
Past Newsletters
Full Index
168
169
170
Current Users
Members
52
Customers
0
Visitors
25
Anon
1253
Total
1330
List...
Not Logged on
Fuel Consumption
Submitted: Monday, Aug 27, 2001 at 00:00
Roger Lowry
I Have a 2000 GU Patrol which is returning only twenty mpg or 14ltr/100klm.
It has a roof rack which I know hinders fuel consumption. However what is the average ltrs/ioo or mpg I should expect.
Advertisement
Suppress Advertisement - Members Only
ThreadID:
390
Replies:
7
Views:
945
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
Thread Summary
X
Forum FAQ
AnswerID: 976 Submitted: Monday, Aug 27, 2001 at 00:00
Nigel
replied: Is it petrol or diesel?
My 1995 petrol Patrol gets 15 litres per 100km on a good
day. That's with extractors and using Morey's fuel
additive.
Reply 1 of 7
FollowupID: 286 Submitted: Tuesday, Aug 28, 2001 at 00:00
Roger Lowry posted:
Sorry People I should have mentioned that it is a 4.2 turbo diesel.
The figures I quoted are highway figures at 110kph on the Newell highway out of Dubbo heading nth & back.
FollowUp 1 of 1
AnswerID: 977 Submitted: Monday, Aug 27, 2001 at 00:00
Joe
replied: Roger,
Assuming you have a petrol engine you are to be commended on achieving consumption figures this good! The Patrol engine is notoriously thirsty and I would expect you to achieve something more like the 15 or 16 mpg I used to see from the Ford Maverick.
If it is either of the diesels thenyou are probably on the money if you do most of your driving on bitumen.
Watch that wallet!
Joe
Reply 2 of 7
AnswerID: 983 Submitted: Tuesday, Aug 28, 2001 at 00:00
David Harrington
replied: Hi Roger,
I have a 3.0 Lt Turbo diesel GU and due to work need to keep detailed fuel/mileage records. It is only 5000Km new and so far is achieving an average of 10lt/100km fuel consumption. This is mainly bitumen city driving however it has done a return trip from
Sydney
to
Batemans Bay
and a little State Forest exploring in that time.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dave
Reply 3 of 7
AnswerID: 990 Submitted: Wednesday, Aug 29, 2001 at 00:00
Steve
replied: 1999 4.2 NA Diesel, average fuel consumption 12litres/100km (50% town, 25% highway, 25% offroad), can drop to around 9 for pure highway and up to 16 for soft sand.
Steve
Reply 4 of 7
AnswerID: 994 Submitted: Wednesday, Aug 29, 2001 at 00:00
Norm Campbell
replied: 20 MPG for a vehicle tipping the scales at 2.5 tonnes unloaded is what you would pretty well expect. As soon as you crank that speedo needle over 80km/h your fuel consumption is going to increase. Exagerated figures of 31 MPG(9litres/100km) I would definitely like to see that. My business partners 2000 GU 4.2 turbo diesel averages exactly the same as what you are getting, with a roof rack.
His best figures on a trip are 13.8 L/100. on highway.
Reply 5 of 7
FollowupID: 363 Submitted: Wednesday, Oct 17, 2001 at 00:00
Richard posted:
Thanks Norm.Roger,If you're worried about fuel consumption,buy a Mazda bubble.Ha Ha
FollowUp 1 of 1
AnswerID: 995 Submitted: Thursday, Aug 30, 2001 at 00:00
Will
replied: Roger,
I have a 4.2 Turbodiesel Patrol, GU 1999 with 80000km, I had it since new.
Best I ever got was 10L/100Km, worst I ever got was 15L/100km (that was doing 140km/h with a roof rack) normal average is 12L/100km no matter what terrain.
I guess you are driving yours too hard or it has a problem.
I found that unlike petrols mine is the same off road (firetrails etc) in fact it had better fuel economy up at the cape (doing the old telegraph track etc) than the highway runs.
Will
Reply 6 of 7
AnswerID: 1027 Submitted: Tuesday, Sep 04, 2001 at 00:00
Peter Foye
replied: Get a diesel!!! I've got a 100 series std (poverty) with the ol' 4.2 diesel and (on a good day!!, 5th gear, flat road) get just UNDER 11 ltr per 100k
Reply 7 of 7
New/Updated
Mid West WA Explorer Card $20.00
Membership Personal - Lifetime $300.00
South West Map Book $9.95
Frogs and Tadpoles of Australia $19.95
Spiders Snails and Other Minibeasts of Australia $19.95
Dinosaurs and Other Ancient Giants of Australia $19.95
Birds of Australia $19.95
Australian Outback Yarns - Bull From The Bush $19.95
Fast Find
Shop Home Page
Discounted Items
Latest/Updated
All Items
Home
|
About Us
|
FAQ
|
Feedback
|
Site Stats
|
Membership
|
Advertising Campaigns
|
Site Updates
Forum
|
Blogs
|
Forum Archive
|
Trader
|
Shop
|
Treks
|
Places
|
Directory
|
Articles
|
Topics
RSS Feeds
|
Link to Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Corporate Membership
|
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 1999 - 2008,
I.T. Beyond Pty Ltd.
All rights reserved.