Not Logged on
[Register] [Logon] 
Section Image Font Size AdjusterDecrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size  

Gulf coast from Hells Gate or Wollogorang?

Submitted: Thursday, Jul 03, 2003 at 15:59

Member - Tim Nivo

G'day all. Was wondering which place to access the coast from, Hells Gate or Wollogorang? Anyone been out there recently? Is one better for fishing than the other? Is one cheaper than the other? Any and all comments much appreciated. Thanks. Tim.
Advertisement
ThreadID: 5794 Replies: 3
Views: 368 FollowUps: 1
This Thread has been Archived
Thread Summary
AnswerID: 24112   Submitted: Thursday, Jul 03, 2003 at 16:25

Andrew replied:

Wollogorang is the answer.
Been there last year.There is a track that goes
all the way to the beach. There is a sandy crossing so
heavy camper is a no no .
Need to leave deposit ( bond really) for rubbish which you get back
when you bring your rabbish with you.
Wollogorang station has a bar and camping area with showers.
Note : fuel very expensive - $1.45 per litre of diesel.
Reply 1 of 3
FollowupID: 16227   Submitted: Thursday, Jul 03, 2003 at 16:41

Member - Timothy posted:

Thanks Andrew. What did you think of the coast? Was there a per day charge as well as the deposit? Tim
FollowUp 1 of 1
AnswerID: 24122   Submitted: Thursday, Jul 03, 2003 at 19:04

Graeme replied:

Comparing the 2 places is like (facilities' wise) chalk & cheese. I stayed in Hells Gate last year & facilities were MUCH better than at Wollogorang.

Access to the coast I know nought about - was on our way to Lawn Hill via Kingfisher & Bowthorn(spelling?) so ...
Reply 2 of 3
AnswerID: 24269   Submitted: Saturday, Jul 05, 2003 at 15:33

Andrew replied:

Tim
I think there was a charge per day but not sure how much ( $20 ?).
As for compering Hells Gate to Wollogorang , I fuelled up at Hells Gate but
did not see anything other then a pub with 2 fuel pumps . Did not see any access to Gulf waters. How was this MUCH better then Wollogorang I don't know.

Wish that people that say that one place was MUCH better then the other at least were more specific.

Reply 3 of 3