www.ExplorOz.com
Your browser does not support the site menu
Click Here
to load alternative navigation.
Latest News
Road Conditions
Updated 2/12/2008
Kimberley
Top End
QLD Coast
Outback NSW
Updated 1/12/2008
WA South Coast
Far North Qld
Road Conditions
All News...
Site Updates...
Search by Topic
How to Submit a Trek Note
4WDriving
Accessories
Accommodation
Activities
Boating
Campers & Trailers
Camping
Caravanning
Communications
Cooking
Driving Skills
Electrics
Fishing
Itineraries & Planning
Membership
Motorhomes
Navigation
Permits
PlotSwap
Recovery Gear
Servicing
Survival
Technical
Things To Do
Topics
Tours
Trek Notes
Trips with Kids
Tyres
Vehicle Choices
Visit Australia
Newsletters
Not Registered
Register Now
Past Newsletters
Full Index
168
169
170
Current Users
Members
41
Customers
2
Visitors
24
Anon
1195
Total
1262
List...
Not Logged on
245/75/16 versus 255/70/16
Submitted: Tuesday, Jan 15, 2002 at 00:00
Colin
I'm a little confused waht to do!!! My Jackaroo standard tyre fitment is 245/70/16. I have been researching
tyres
and was about to order a set of Copper Discoverer S/T's. They don't come in the 245/70/16, so I have to choose 245/75/16 or 255/70/16. All the research (on this site and elsewhere) suggest to go for the 75 profiles, but. I have now been told by the tyre retailer that they would be illegal and probably void my insurance in case of an accident. The retailer stated it was due to the increase in rolling diameter exceeding 15mm. If this is the law how does everyone get those 33" and 35"
tyres
legally on their rigs. He said talk to your insurance company or the RTA for the definative answer, but we all know what talking to government departments and insurance companies is like don't we? Some of you knowledgable contributors out there must know what the real facts are.
Please help it is very confusing.
Col
Advertisement
Suppress Advertisement - Members Only
ThreadID:
656
Replies:
8
Views:
2188
FollowUps:
5
This Thread has been Archived
Thread Summary
X
Forum FAQ
AnswerID: 1767 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Rod
replied: Colin, you could do what I've done and that is actually state the size of your
tyres
on your insurance application. My money's been accepted. As for Cooper
tyres
read the fine print, one little nic and your guaranttee's blown.
Reply 1 of 8
AnswerID: 1768 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Mike
replied: Colin, save yourself the hassles and fit BFG A/Ts as they are available in standard Jackaroo size. I've had them on mine for about 52000kms and couldn't be happier. They've done very well on Simpson sand,
Birdsville Track
& Mungo mud, Pedirka track & Flinders rocks and the Victorian High country. No Punctures yet and wearing really well. Happy trails, Mike.
Reply 2 of 8
AnswerID: 1773 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Grant
replied: Colin, spoke to my local tyre dealer about the exact same thing yesterday and he said "what's it say on your tyre placard? No can do because they (insurance companies) can come back at us (tyre dealer) and sue us for fitting an illegal tyre."
So tyre dealers are protecting their own arses, and fair enough, but not trying very hard to be helpful. So I spoke to my insurance rep this morning and quizzed him and basically it comes down to the Load Ratings and Speed Ratings. If you are on or above the trye placards minimum requirements on these you should be ok. They are mainly concerned about a cheap tyre that doesn't meet the placard in the above two areas, therefore making it unsafe if loaded up or going too fast. To Rod, at least Coopers offer a guarantee of sorts so they must be fairly confident they wear reasonably well. Do BFG A/T owners feel so threatened by the Cooper S/T's that at every opportunity on this and other forums they feel the need to bag them. Give the S/T's a couple of years to either prove themselves or fail. Time will tell. Colin, as Rod rightly said, state your tyre size on your insurance application and if they take your money, then they have no comeback. Steven P has a Jack with 245/75's on in Vic, he may read this and let you know his experience.
Reply 3 of 8
FollowupID: 588 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Grant posted:
Website found, waiting for reply, once, twice, no reply. Wrong again. It had. Damn computers.
FollowUp 1 of 2
FollowupID: 590 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Colin posted:
Grant,I got your reply the first time!!! I am concerned that even if the Insurance company was to take my money, that if the RTA was to later say the tyre fitment was illegal it would not matter what I had declared on the policy. Remember Insurnace companies are in the bisiness of taking our money and minimising how much of it they have to give back. Am I too cynical? I say no, just wise to their ways The question is still how do you get more rubber legally? Are all those 33" & upwards
tyres
all illegal?
FollowUp 2 of 2
AnswerID: 1774 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Grant
replied: Colin, spoke to my local tyre dealer about the exact same thing yesterday and he said "what's it say on your tyre placard? No can do because they (insurance companies) can come back at us (tyre dealer) and sue us for fitting an illegal tyre."
So tyre dealers are protecting their own arses, and fair enough, but not trying very hard to be helpful. So I spoke to my insurance rep this morning and quizzed him and basically it comes down to the Load Ratings and Speed Ratings. If you are on or above the trye placards minimum requirements on these you should be ok. They are mainly concerned about a cheap tyre that doesn't meet the placard in the above two areas, therefore making it unsafe if loaded up or going too fast. To Rod, at least Coopers offer a guarantee of sorts so they must be fairly confident they wear reasonably well. Do BFG A/T owners feel so threatened by the Cooper S/T's that at every opportunity on this and other forums they feel the need to bag them. Give the S/T's a couple of years to either prove themselves or fail. Time will tell. Colin, as Rod rightly said, state your tyre size on your insurance application and if they take your money, then they have no comeback. Steven P has a Jack with 245/75's on in Vic, he may read this and let you know his experience.
Reply 4 of 8
AnswerID: 1775 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 16, 2002 at 00:00
Grant
replied: Colin, spoke to my local tyre dealer about the exact same thing yesterday and he said "what's it say on your tyre placard? No can do because they (insurance companies) can come back at us (tyre dealer) and sue us for fitting an illegal tyre."
So tyre dealers are protecting their own arses, and fair enough, but not trying very hard to be helpful. So I spoke to my insurance rep this morning and quizzed him and basically it comes down to the Load Ratings and Speed Ratings. If you are on or above the trye placards minimum requirements on these you should be ok. They are mainly concerned about a cheap tyre that doesn't meet the placard in the above two areas, therefore making it unsafe if loaded up or going too fast. To Rod, at least Coopers offer a guarantee of sorts so they must be fairly confident they wear reasonably well. Do BFG A/T owners feel so threatened by the Cooper S/T's that at every opportunity on this and other forums they feel the need to bag them. Give the S/T's a couple of years to either prove themselves or fail. Time will tell. Colin, as Rod rightly said, state your tyre size on your insurance application and if they take your money, then they have no comeback. Steven P has a Jack with 245/75's on in Vic, he may read this and let you know his experience.
Reply 5 of 8
AnswerID: 1789 Submitted: Friday, Jan 18, 2002 at 00:00
Rob
replied: I was doing a bit of digging about modiforcations a while back. I do not know which state you are in, but the NSW RTA has a webpage that covers this issue at http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/manuals/registration/lvm/lvmfrm.htm
The information about wheel size is at http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/manuals/registration/lvm/lvmfrm.htm & I should imagine that the insurance companies would comply with this law.
Reply 6 of 8
FollowupID: 606 Submitted: Monday, Jan 21, 2002 at 00:00
Col posted:
Thanks for the lead Rob. I ended up putting the 245/75/16 Cooper S/T's on the Jackaroo, and the answer is they comply with both the speed rating and load rating requirements, which is all the RTA is concerned about. All I can say is that some tyre retailers make things up as they go along. Will know how good my choice was after the Ozzie day weekend, when the
Vic High Country
beckons.
FollowUp 1 of 1
AnswerID: 1847 Submitted: Monday, Jan 28, 2002 at 00:00
Eli
replied: Hi Col
I’m trying to find a way to replace my 100 Series Landcruiser’s original 265/70/16
tyres
with a larger 275/75/16 (52 MM extra in diameter), and stay legal.
I wouldn’t like to spoil your day but I was researching the RTA regulations for a few months (including a few phone calls to their
technical
department) and I couldn’t fined a way around the paragraph stating:
“For a minor modification (owner certified), the overall diameter of the alternative wheel and tyre must not be greater than 15mm over the largest diameter wheel and tyre specified for the vehicle and shall not be more than 15mm below the smallest diameter wheel and tyre specified for the vehicle” You can find it at the RTA web site that Rob referred you to (3.8.3 Certification of replacement wheels and
tyres
).
I will be happy to hear if you or anybody else found a way around that part of the regulations.
Thanks Eli
Reply 7 of 8
FollowupID: 630 Submitted: Tuesday, Jan 29, 2002 at 00:00
Col posted:
The answer for me was on the web site that you refer to. The key is is 'not greater then 15mm over the LARGEST DIAMETER CERTIFIED' The Jackaroo it seems is certified for a variety of tyre sizes, they are all listed in the owners manual and on the tyre placard.
FollowUp 1 of 1
AnswerID: 1848 Submitted: Monday, Jan 28, 2002 at 00:00
Eli
replied: Hi Col
I’m trying to find a way to replace my 100 Series Landcruiser’s original 265/70/16
tyres
with a larger 275/75/16 (52 MM extra in diameter) and stay legal.
I wouldn’t like to spoil your day but I was researching the RTA regulations for a few months (including a few phone calls to their
technical
department) and I couldn’t fined a way around the paragraph stating:
“For a minor modification (owner certified), the overall diameter of the alternative wheel and tyre must not be greater than 15mm over the largest diameter wheel and tyre specified for the vehicle and shall not be more than 15mm below the smallest diameter wheel and tyre specified for the vehicle” You can find it at the RTA web site that Rob referred you to (3.8.3 Certification of replacement wheels and
tyres
).
I will be happy to hear if you or anybody else will find a way around that part of the regulations.
Thanks Eli
Reply 8 of 8
FollowupID: 631 Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 30, 2002 at 00:00
Eli posted:
Hi COL
Lucky you, unfortunately the Landcruiser 100 is certified only for one size.
Thanks Eli
FollowUp 1 of 1
New/Updated
Mid West WA Explorer Card $20.00
Membership Personal - Lifetime $300.00
South West Map Book $9.95
Frogs and Tadpoles of Australia $19.95
Spiders Snails and Other Minibeasts of Australia $19.95
Dinosaurs and Other Ancient Giants of Australia $19.95
Birds of Australia $19.95
Australian Outback Yarns - Bull From The Bush $19.95
Fast Find
Shop Home Page
Discounted Items
Latest/Updated
All Items
Home
|
About Us
|
FAQ
|
Feedback
|
Site Stats
|
Membership
|
Advertising Campaigns
|
Site Updates
Forum
|
Blogs
|
Forum Archive
|
Trader
|
Shop
|
Treks
|
Places
|
Directory
|
Articles
|
Topics
RSS Feeds
|
Link to Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Corporate Membership
|
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 1999 - 2008,
I.T. Beyond Pty Ltd.
All rights reserved.