Not Logged on
[Register] [Logon] 
Section Image Font Size AdjusterDecrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size  

92 4Runner 3.8l conversion

Submitted: Thursday, Jan 01, 2004 at 21:43

dovche

Hi guys,
I've got a '92 4Runner 3.0 V6 with a little over 200,000 Kms and the compression is shot, though the body is in quite good condition. As I'm not sure whether it's the top end or bottom end, I'm trying to decide whether to get a change-over engine (RPM Engines quoted over $4,500 PLUS PARTS as required) or to get a Holden 3.8l conversion.
I Know Marks 4X4 Adapters have kits available and have a good reputation, but I'm seeking advice on which course of action to take.
Has anyone had the conversion? What are your thoughts? Is it worth it or just trade it in for another?
Advertisement
ThreadID: 9438 Replies: 1
Views: 418 FollowUps: None
This Thread has been Archived
Thread Summary

AnswerID: 41507   Submitted: Thursday, Jan 01, 2004 at 22:13

ross replied:

If the performance of the original motor when it had good compression was acceptable ,then go for the change over.An commodore v6 swap will set you back at least $6k and youll have to put up with 6 months fine tuning if your dedicated.
Putting the reconditioned original motor back wont harm your resale value.Cars with engine swaps tend to turn most buyers off unless it is real cheap.
Reply 1 of 1